In the process of globalisation regional innovation
benchmarking and entrepreneurial management is getting more and more
important. The Thematic Network STRINNOP has proved itself as a platform
for the international exchange of regional innovation benchmarking
activities and for successful entrepreneurial concepts to foster innovative
activities in SME and in the region.
Main concern of the final conference in Bremen (Germany) which was
organized in collaboration with the Transatlantic Business School
Alliance was to share hot topics and discuss project findings. Key
topics were:
- regional benchmarking and company benchmarking
state of art
- business incubation and technology centres,
including how to a ttract young firms,
and
- entrepreneurship building at universities and
within companies.
In addition to the conference study visits at the Technology
Park Bremen and at the cluster "mobile solutions were organised,
the second in collaboration with the ERIK-thematic working group "Clusters".
Here future trends and challenges in the rapidly evolving world of
mobile communications were discussed.
Topics in this context were:
- BITZ. Bremer Innovations- und Technologiezentrum
- Pre-Seed-Program for Academic Start-Ups
- t.i.m.e. programme (www.bremen-in-time.de)
- cluster "mobile solution group" (www.mobile-solution-group.de)
- Mobile Solution Center
- Project Center for e/m-business.
Invited experts from all over Europe met in Bremen and
formed a top-class conference programme (see agenda, presentations
and participation list at the project website: www.strinnop.net).
Speakers from politics, academia, R&D organisations, regional
development agencies and ministries offered an insight into current
regional strategies, implementation activities and future trends.
About 140 registered participants from 33 European countries as well
as from U.S.A. and Mexico enjoyed the presentations and different
perspectives given on services to innovative SME, activities to perform
regional innovation benchmarking (see STRINNOP Guidebook www.strinnop.net)
and business oriented topics.
The discussion during the conference underlined that
regional economical development needs innovation and its implementation
in the market. Regarding the educational support the presentations
showed that especially those curricula offer a fruitful framework
for innovative ideas which are highly practice-oriented and include
an intercultural approach at an early stage. Looking at the good practice
show cases (see library of good practice cases of the STRINNOP partners
in the web www.strinnop.net) the well directed public money in specific
strategic measures in a region show correlative economic growth such
as in the case of VIB Biotech Valley in Gent (F), Microtechnologies
in Itzehoe (D) or Mobile Solutions in Bremen (D). The conference offered
not only information on hot topics but first of all gave the opportunity
to exchanging new approaches and ideas with other regions working
in the field of innovation support activities.
Next to learning from good practice experiences
the newly developed STRINNOP Facilitator was of high interest to the
conference participants. The Tool supports the self assessment of
the Regional Innovation Profile by providing a set of indicators.
The user fills in his ratings and gets an immediate visual feedback
of his assessment in form of a "spider diagram" with axes
according the STRINNOP step-by-step approach.

Figure 1: STRINNOP
Facilitator.
A step-wise comparison of an individual
Regional Innovation Profile to the whole STRINNOP sample.
Single indicators are merged by the STRINNOP
Facilitator to the rating of single steps in a comfortable way not
requiring a score for every indicator. The individual assessment
can be benchmarked to the ratings to (min-mean-max) of the whole
STRINNOP sample.
The STRINNOP Facilitator
indicates the user the strengths and weaknesses of his/her region
in a visual way. If the facilitator discloses some regional weaknesses
the user can directly switch to the STRINNOP website in order to
find out which good practice tools the STRINNOP members offer to
overcome the identified weaknesses. All STRINNOP members are willing
to assist other regions in transferring their published STRINNOP
good practice tools to other regions and adapting them according
to the specific regional framework and regulations.
The regional self-assessments by the
STRINNOP regions were performed by single partner institutions,
by a group of actors of the regional innovation support or by members
of the regional steering committee. Therefore the gathered experiences
cover a broad scope. The increased awareness of the involved persons
for the regional SWOT (strengths weaknesses opportunities
threats) is often mentioned as one major benefit of this
self-assessment experiment. The debate on single indicators within
the single regions and within the STRINNOP network has strengthen
the awareness of most of the regions for developing clearer targets
for the regional innovation supporting infrastructure as they have
so far.
The STRINNOP Facilitator is available under "www.STRINNOP.net
à results" and enables a region to assess itself and
to compare the results to the STRINNOP sample in a convenient and
pragmatic way.
In conclusion the discussions of the conference
showed that there is high interest to collaborate in developing
a methodology for regional innovation benchmarking and profiling.
STRINNOP partners plan to develop the methodology further in the
context of a planned call for proposals by DG Enterprise in spring
2004.
| Study visit |
Technology Park Bremen
&
Cluster mobile solutions |
Dr. Adolf Kopp,
head of division Incubation & Center Management, BIA GmbH |
Study
Visit Technology Park (pdf - 2,7 MB) |
Robert Virkus
Scaraboo GmbH |
Study
Visit_company scaraboo (pdf - 1,5 MB)
|
Jörg Kautzner
BIA Bremer Innovations-Agentur GmbH, division t.i.m.e. & e-logistics |
Study
Visit_time_e-m-business (pdf - 1,9 MB)
|
Dr. M. Boronowsky
TZI, Center for Computing Technologies at the University of Bremen
|
Study
Visit_tzi (pdf - 2,5 MB)
|
| International Conference |
|
Prof. Dr. Andy Czuchry
East Tennessee State University, AFG Industries Chair of Excellence
in Business and Technology |
Key
Note Andy Czuchry (pdf - 229 KB)
|
Dr. Olaf Arndt
Prognos AG |
Keynote
Prognos Olaf Arndt (pdf - 2,0MB)
|
Sabine Walther
ttz Schleswig - Holstein |
Panel
1-1 Innovations-Audit (pdf - 56 KB)
|
Bernard De Potter
IWT Institute for the promotion of scientific and technological
research in industry |
Panel
1-2 Innovation Profiling Flanders (pdf - 80 KB)
|
Irma Priedl
Amt der NÖ Landesregierung |
Panel
1-3 STRINNOP Findings (pdf - 615 KB)
|
John Cornbill
EPI Centre, Coventry University Techno Centre |
Panel
1-4 Monitoring Clusters (pdf - 20 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Werner Vogt
Siemens AG Erlangen, president of Standard Drives Division |
Panel
2-1 Siemens (pdf - 214 KB)
|
Linnéa Hult
Chalmers Innovation, Business developer/regional development |
Panel
2-2 Chalmers Innovation (pdf - 120 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Andy Czuchry
East Tennessee State University
Prof. Dr. Kenneth R. Currie
Tennessee Tech, Center for Manufacturing and Research |
Panel
2-3 Innovative Entrepreneurship (pdf - 18 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. José Antonio
Instituto Panamericano de Alta Dirección de Empresas IPADE,
Mexico |
Panel
2-4 Entrepreneurship Mexico (pdf - 253 KB)
|
An Debbaut
Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) |
Panel
3-1 Gent Biotech Valley (pdf - 513KB)
|
Dr. Ingo Hussla
Gesellschaft für Technologieförderung mbH (IZET) |
Panel
3-2 start-up initiative SH (pdf - 4,3 MB)
|
Prof. Dr. JimHales
East Tennessee State University |
Panel
3-3_Uni-Sponsored Incubators (pdf - 28 KB)
|
Pierre Bourotte
inno AG, consultant for incubator forum "Gate2Growth" |
Panel
3-4_Gate2Growth (pdf - 512 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Craig Galbraith
University of North Carolina |
Panel
3-5_Entrepreneurship (pdf - 51 KB)
|
Dr. Werner Willms
BAW Institute for Economic Research GmbH |
WS
1-1_Benchmarking Bremen (pdf - 490 KB)
|
Peter Fobian Jensen
Funen Business Development Center |
WS
1-2_Benchmark ICT West DK (pdf - 659 KB)
|
Guy Faulkner
University of Westminster |
WS
1-3_Motorsport Cluster (pdf - 323 KB)
|
Fabienne Corvers
European Commission, Research DG |
WS
1-4_EC Research (pdf - 332 KB)
WS
1-5_IRE Future_Infos (pdf - 58 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Andy Czuchry
East Tennessee State University |
WS
2-1_Entrepreneurial Leadership (pdf - 19 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Helga Meyer
Hochschule Bremen, University of Applied Science |
WS
2-2_Curricula Demands (pdf - 991 KB)
|
Prof. Dr. Marco Mongiello
University of Westminster, Harrow Business School |
WS
2-3_IBSA Programme (pdf - 512 KB)
|
Thomas Stahlecker
Fraunhofer-Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung
|
WS
3-1_Demands of Entrepreneurs (pdf - 51 KB)
WS
3-2_Training during Start-up 2 (pdf - 367 KB)
|
Andreas Mündl
BIA Bremer Innovations-Agentur GmbH |
WS
3-3_Bremen Seed Program (pdf - 1,2 MB)
|
Sören Jensen
International Science Park Odense |
WS
3-4_Pre-Seed Financing Funen (pdf - 101 KB)
|
Here you can download informations about the speakers
and abstracts of their presentations: